<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Kei Miller reading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caribbeanfreeradio.com/blog/2007/07/05/the-kei-miller-reading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caribbeanfreeradio.com/blog/2007/07/05/the-kei-miller-reading/</link>
	<description>The Caribbean's first podcast - almost live from Trinidad and Tobago!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:56:04 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Georgia</title>
		<link>http://www.caribbeanfreeradio.com/blog/2007/07/05/the-kei-miller-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-111616</link>
		<dc:creator>Georgia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 02:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caribbeanfreeradio.com/blog/2007/07/05/the-kei-miller-reading/#comment-111616</guid>
		<description>Jonathan, as several of you unmarrieds appear to think my use of the term &quot;unmarriageable&quot; was targeting you directly, a little clarification is perhaps in order here. The only reason I refer to some of you as unmarriageable is because I cannot think of anybody who is possibly good enough for any of you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan, as several of you unmarrieds appear to think my use of the term &#8220;unmarriageable&#8221; was targeting you directly, a little clarification is perhaps in order here. The only reason I refer to some of you as unmarriageable is because I cannot think of anybody who is possibly good enough for any of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.caribbeanfreeradio.com/blog/2007/07/05/the-kei-miller-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-110633</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 15:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caribbeanfreeradio.com/blog/2007/07/05/the-kei-miller-reading/#comment-110633</guid>
		<description>I wonder if his work is any good. Not that it would excuse his vanity, but at least he&#039;d have more of a claim to it.

BTW, G, as one one of your friends who is not married and has not sworn off marriage, does that mean...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if his work is any good. Not that it would excuse his vanity, but at least he&#8217;d have more of a claim to it.</p>
<p>BTW, G, as one one of your friends who is not married and has not sworn off marriage, does that mean&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Georgia</title>
		<link>http://www.caribbeanfreeradio.com/blog/2007/07/05/the-kei-miller-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-110499</link>
		<dc:creator>Georgia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 19:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caribbeanfreeradio.com/blog/2007/07/05/the-kei-miller-reading/#comment-110499</guid>
		<description>Being a not unreasonable type, rr, I did remove the image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a not unreasonable type, rr, I did remove the image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rr</title>
		<link>http://www.caribbeanfreeradio.com/blog/2007/07/05/the-kei-miller-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-110498</link>
		<dc:creator>rr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 19:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caribbeanfreeradio.com/blog/2007/07/05/the-kei-miller-reading/#comment-110498</guid>
		<description>Did he give you a reason? and did you remove it? Must have been a tricky decision either way. However I&#039;d venture that the appearance of vanity is probably a great deal more unpleasant than the image in question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did he give you a reason? and did you remove it? Must have been a tricky decision either way. However I&#8217;d venture that the appearance of vanity is probably a great deal more unpleasant than the image in question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
